PROCESS MODELING
Material handling plays a critical role in logistics, bridging the gap between raw materials and the final product. It involves the systematic movement, storage, and control of materials throughout the production process, ensuring efficient transportation and minimal delays. Understanding the dynamics of material flow within a queuing system is essential for optimizing the utilization of equipment and maintaining a steady production output. Using RL to train robots in simulated environments can identify the most efficient workflows, reducing the time and resources required for each task.
This study is for educational purposes only. No commercial purposes intended.
WORK FLOWS
In this context, the simple logistics of material handling can be visualized as a network where materials are transported by various equipment (such as conveyors, forklifts, or trucks) to different stages of production. These stages may include raw material collection, intermediate processing, and final product assembly. The queuing system within this framework arises when materials wait to be picked up, transported, or processed due to equipment availability or production constraints.
The study focuses on analyzing the interaction between equipment and material queues, identifying bottlenecks, and improving overall throughput. By simulating and modeling these logistics processes, the study aims to enhance the decision-making process for equipment allocation, reduce idle times, and achieve a streamlined production flow from raw materials to the final product.
Process modeling in RL (Reinforcement Learning) refers to the development of a framework that can accurately represent and simulate the steps, workflows, and interactions involved in robotic tasks. In robotic applications, the process typically involves a sequence of actions that the robot must take in order to accomplish a goal or optimize a process.
In this case study, we explore an existing production facility where the owner has opted to increase the delivery rate of raw materials to meet growing production demands, without expanding the current storage capacity. This decision presents a logistical challenge: managing the increased flow of materials while maintaining smooth operations and preventing system inefficiencies.
The production facility operates as a network of interconnected processes, including material unloading, storage, transportation to production lines, intermediate processing, and final product assembly. With an increased delivery rate of raw materials, the queuing system becomes more dynamic, and potential bottlenecks may arise due to storage limitations, equipment capacity constraints, or process inefficiencies.
The objective of the study is to identify and analyze the bottleneck(s) in the production process caused by this decision. A bottleneck is the point in the process where the flow of materials is constrained, leading to delays, idle times for equipment, and reduced overall productivity. By examining the facility's material handling system, we will determine the specific stage(s) where congestion or inefficiencies occur and propose strategies to alleviate these constraints.
This study will utilize data collection, process mapping, and queuing analysis to identify the bottlenecks. It will focus on the following key areas:
Material Arrival and Unloading: Assess whether increased delivery frequency leads to delays in unloading or queuing of delivery vehicles.
Intermediate Storage: Evaluate how limited storage capacity impacts the ability to handle higher raw material volumes.
Material Transportation: Determine if equipment (e.g., conveyors, forklifts) can manage the increased volume or if transport queues form.
Processing and Production Lines: Analyze whether the production process has sufficient capacity to handle the increased input without delays.
Based on the provided figure and the situation described, the bottleneck in the production process is the storage capacity. The facility’s inability to accommodate the increased delivery rate of raw materials within the existing storage infrastructure results in significant inefficiencies.
Problem Description:
Delivery Trucks Waiting: With storage at full capacity, incoming delivery trucks cannot unload their materials promptly. This forces trucks to queue and wait, leading to delays in material availability for production.
Production Dependency on Storage Availability: The consumption of raw materials in production creates storage slots, but this process depends on production throughput, which cannot match the increased delivery frequency.
Increased Lead Time: The waiting time for delivery trucks escalates as storage remains occupied for extended periods, disrupting the overall logistics chain.
Impact of the Bottleneck:
Idle Time for Delivery Trucks: Trucks waiting for storage slots to free up increases logistics costs and reduces transport efficiency.
Production Disruptions: Any delay in material availability for production, caused by mismanagement or slower transport turnover, could lead to interruptions in the production schedule.
Increased Costs: Inefficient logistics and prolonged truck queues result in higher operational costs, including demurrage fees for trucks and potential penalties for delayed delivery schedules.
Systemic Ripple Effects: Delays in material unloading can cascade through the supply chain, affecting downstream processes and potentially leading to missed production targets.
Next Steps:
Data Collection:
Measure the average waiting time for delivery trucks.
Evaluate the rate of material consumption in production versus delivery frequency.
Quantify storage turnover rates.
Analysis:
Identify peak delivery and consumption periods.
Assess how many slots are required to match delivery rates with storage availability.
Proposed Solutions:
Adjust Delivery Schedules: Stagger deliveries to align with production consumption rates, reducing peak demand on storage.
Optimize Material Flow: Improve internal logistics to accelerate raw material movement from storage to production.
Introduce Just-in-Time Delivery: Coordinate deliveries to align closely with production needs, minimizing the need for storage altogether.
Temporary Storage Solutions: Utilize nearby off-site or modular temporary storage to handle overflow during peak delivery periods.
The bottleneck analysis confirms that the limited storage capacity (just after 15 deliveries) is the critical constraint, and addressing it through a combination of scheduling, process optimization, and possible infrastructure adjustments is necessary to improve overall production efficiency.
The workflow can be found in this link: https://youtu.be/BT_jUy0V1AQ and in 3D https://youtu.be/cCu-qpvGsvw